Dar al-Hadith
Sunan Abi Dawud

Hadith 3292

Report an issue

Sunan Abi Dawud · Hadith 3292

This message and the hadith reference are sent privately to the administrator. Your saved commentary is not included. Please avoid personal or sensitive information. Report terms.

Whoever Held The View That Expiation Is Necessary If The Vow Was For Disobedience

English source

Darussalam · Volume 4

21. THE BOOK OFOATHS AND VOWS

Sunan Abi Dawud Darussalam English translation

Arabic source
Shamela Arabic edition (opens in a new tab)

الحديث: 3292 ¦ الجزء: 3 ¦ الصفحة: 233

DarussalamṢaḥīhAl-AlbaniSahih
Al-Albani source references (1)
View bookmarks

Select a passage to highlight it. Click or tap a highlight to remove it.

Text and translation

English translation

3292. (There is another chain) from Ibn Shihāb, from Sulaimān bin Arqam, that Yahyā bin Abī Kathīr informed him, from Abū Salamah, from 'Aishah, she said: "The Messenger of Allāh ﷺ said: 'There is no vow for disobedience, and its expiation is Kaffāratu yamīn.' (Ṣaḥīh) Aḥmad bin Muḥammad Al-Marwāzī said: "The Ḥadīth is only that which was narrated by 'Alī bin Al-Mubārak, from Yahyā bin Abī Kathīr, from Muḥammad bin Az-Zubair, from his father, from 'Imrān bin Ḥuṣain, from the Prophet ﷺ." Meaning that Sulaimān bin Arqam made a mistake in it, and Az-Zuhri carried it like that from him, and he narrated it in a Mursal form from Abū Salamah, from 'Aishah.[1] Abū Dāwud said: Baqiyyah reported it from Al-Awzā'i, from Yahyā, from Muhammad Ibn Az-Zubair, with the chain of 'Alī bin Al-Mubārak, similarly.

Arabic text

3292 - حَدَّثَنَا أَحْمَدُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ الْمَرْوَزِيُّ، حَدَّثَنَا أَيُّوبُ بْنُ سُلَيْمَانَ، عَنْ أَبِي بَكْرِ بْنِ أَبِي أُوَيْسٍ، عَنْ سُلَيْمَانَ بْنِ بِلَالٍ، عَنِ ابْنِ أَبِي عَتيِقٍ، وَمُوسَى بْنِ عُقْبَةَ، عَنِ ابْنِ شِهَابٍ، عَنْ سُلَيْمَانَ بْنِ أَرْقَمَ، أَنَّ يَحْيَى بْنَ أَبِي كَثِيرٍ، أَخْبَرَهُ عَنْ أَبِي سَلَمَةَ، عَنْ عَائِشَةَ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهَا، قَالَتْ: قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ: «لَا نَذْرَ فِي مَعْصِيَةٍ، وَكَفَّارَتُهُ كَفَّارَةُ يَمِينٍ»، قَالَ أَحْمَدُ بْنُ مُحَمَّدٍ الْمَرْوَزِيُّ، إِنَّمَا الْحَدِيثُ حَدِيثُ عَلِيِّ بْنِ الْمُبَارَكِ، عَنْ يَحْيَى بْنِ أَبِي كَثِيرٍ، عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ الزُّبَيْرِ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنْ عِمْرَانَ بْنِ حُصَيْنٍ، عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ أَرَادَ أَنَّ سُلَيْمَانَ بْنَ أَرْقَمَ وَهِمَ فِيهِ وَحَمَلَهُ عَنْهُ الزُّهْرِيُّ، وَأَرْسَلَهُ عَنْ أَبِي سَلَمَةَ، عَنْ عَائِشَةَ رَحِمَهَا اللَّهُ، قَالَ أَبُو دَاوُدَ: رَوَى بَقِيَّةُ، عَنِ الْأَوْزَاعِيِّ، عَنْ يَحْيَى، عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ الزُّبَيْرِ، بِإِسْنَادِ عَلِيِّ بْنِ الْمُبَارَكِ، مِثْلَهُ

My commentary

Personal notes

Your commentary saves automatically in this browser, separate from the published commentary. It stays private unless you include it in a shared study file.

Footnotes

  1. 1

    [1] Aḥmad bin Muḥammad Al-Marwāzī, from whom he heard number 3292.

  2. 2

    [2] Meaning, as explained in the details that follow, it is not easy for them to verify which is the correct chain of narration, and its importance revolves around whether or not Sulaimān bin Arqam is the one that really narrated it, because of criticism about him, as well as other matters related to the precision of its transmission.

  3. 3

    [3] Meaning, as follows. All of this, with a slight variation in wording, is mentioned in Masā'il Al-Imām Aḥmad by the author.