Sunan an-Nasai

Hadith 1369 (B)

Report an issue

Sunan an-Nasai · Hadith 1369 (B)

This message and the hadith reference are sent privately to the administrator. Your saved commentary is not included. Please avoid personal or sensitive information. Report terms.

The Obligation Of Jumu'ah

English source

Darussalam · Volume 2

14. The Book Of Jumu'ah (Friday Prayer)

Sunan an-Nasai Darussalam English translation

Arabic source

Arabic text is not available for this narration.

DarussalamSahîhAl-AlbaniNot found
View bookmarks

Select a passage to highlight it. Click or tap a highlight to remove it.

Text and translation

English translation

1369B. (It was narrated that Abû Hurairah said: “The first Jumu'ah to be held, after the Jumu'ah that was held with the Messenger of Allâh ﷺ in Makkah, was a Jumu'ah in Juwâthâ in Al-Bahrain, a village of ‘Abdul-Qais.”) (Sahîh)

Arabic text is unavailable in the supplied source files.

My commentary

Personal notes

Your commentary saves automatically in this browser, separate from the published commentary. It stays private unless you include it in a shared study file.

Commentary

1. In this narration, instead of Makkah there should have been Madinah, because according to the more correct versions, the Jumu'ah (prayer) was started in Madinah. (See Fath Al-Bârî No. 892) Even so, the delegation of the tribe of Abd Al-Qais from Bahrain had arrived to meet the Prophet ﷺ in Madinah. Obviously, the Jumu'ah must have commenced after it only. And the Jumu'ah prayers used to take place in Madinah at that time. 2. Jiwâthâ was a village in Bahrain. This indicates that offering the Friday prayer in a village is permissible. That is to say, if a sizeable number of people are living together, they should perform the Jumu'ah. As for the restrictions imposed by the Hanafites (for the validity of the Jumu'ah) such as that it should be a city, that the prescribed legal penalties should have been carried out there, that it should have a ruler in its correct sense, that there should be a judge, etc., - they have no evidence for support for any of them.