The Obligation Of Ghusl When The Two Circumcised Parts Meet
Darussalam · Volume 1
1. The Book OfPurificationSunan an-Nasai Darussalam English translation
الحديث: 192 ¦ الجزء: 1 ¦ الصفحة: 111
Source no. 192 · Volume 1 · Page 336
Sahih
صحيح، انظر ما قبله (١٩١) // صحيح الجامع الصغير (٤٧٩) ، مختصر مسلم (١٥٢) //
Source no. 186 · Volume 1 · Page 41
Sahih
(صحيح) - انظر ما قبله [صحيح الجامع الصغير ٤٧٩ - مختصر مسلم ١٥٢].
Select a passage to highlight it. Click or tap a highlight to remove it.
192. It was narrated from Abû Hurairah that the Messenger of Allâh ﷺ said: "When (a man) sits between the four parts of his wife's body and exerts himself, then Ghusl becomes obligatory." (Sahih) Abū ‘Abdur-Raḥmān said: “This is a mistake what is correct is; ‘Ash’ath from Al-Hasan, from Abū Hurairah.” An-Nadr bin Shumail, and others, reported the Hadīth from Shu’bah just as Khālid reported it.”
192 - أَخْبَرَنَا إِبْرَاهِيمُ بْنُ يَعْقُوبَ بْنِ إِسْحَاقَ الْجَوْزَجَانِيُّ قَالَ: حَدَّثَنِي عَبْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ يُوسُفَ قَالَ: حَدَّثَنَا عِيسَى بْنُ يُونُسَ قَالَ: حَدَّثَنَا أَشْعَثُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الْمَلِكِ، عَنِ ابْنِ سِيرِينَ، عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ، أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ قَالَ: «إِذَا قَعَدَ بَيْنَ شُعَبِهَا الْأَرْبَعِ، ثُمَّ اجْتَهَدَ فَقَدْ وَجَبَ الْغُسْلُ» قَالَ أَبُو عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ: هَذَا خَطَأٌ وَالصَّوَابُ أَشْعَثُ، عَنِ الْحَسَنِ، عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ. وَقَدْ رَوَى الْحَدِيثَ عَنْ شُعْبَةَ، النَّضْرُ بْنُ شُمَيْلٍ، وَغَيْرُهُ كَمَا رَوَاهُ خَالِدٌ
Your commentary saves automatically in this browser, separate from the published commentary. It stays private unless you include it in a shared study file.
a. Abū ‘Abdur-Raḥmān An-Nasā’ī states that this chain is erroneous. The correct chain is: (‘Ash’ath on the authority of Al-Hasan on the authority of Abū Hurairah). Nadr bin Shumail and others have narrated this Hadīth on the authority of Shu’bah as Khālid has narrated. b. In Khālid’s narration there is the mention of Hasan Basrī, while in this Hadīth, instead of him, Ibn Sirin has been mentioned. Imam An-Nasā’ī cautions that the mention of Ibn Sirin in this Hadīth is not accurate. Hasan should be mentioned instead, because Hadīth No. 191 possesses consecutive links.