Sunan an-Nasai

Hadith 3528

Report an issue

Sunan an-Nasai · Hadith 3528

This message and the hadith reference are sent privately to the administrator. Your saved commentary is not included. Please avoid personal or sensitive information. Report terms.

The 'Iddah Of A Woman Separated By Khul'

English source

Darussalam · Volume 4

27. The Book Of Divorce

Sunan an-Nasai Darussalam English translation

Arabic source
Shamela Arabic edition (opens in a new tab)

الحديث: 3498 ¦ الجزء: 6 ¦ الصفحة: 186

DarussalamHasanAl-AlbaniHasan sahih
Al-Albani source references (2)
View bookmarks

Select a passage to highlight it. Click or tap a highlight to remove it.

Text and translation

English translation

3528. ‘Ubâdah bin Al-Walîd bin ‘Ubâdah bin Aş-Şâmit narrated from Rubayy’ bint Mu’awwidh. He said: “I said to her: ‘Tell me your Hadîth.’ She said: ‘I was separated from husband by Khul’, then I came to ‘Uthmân and asked him: What Iddah do I have to observe? He said: You do not have to observe any Iddah, unless you had intercourse with him recently, in which case you should stay with him until you have menstruated. He said: In that I am following the ruling of the Messenger of Allâh ﷺ concerning Mariam Al-Maghâliyyah, who was married to Thâbit bin Qais and was separated by Khul’ from him.” (Hasan)

Arabic text

3498 - أَخْبَرَنَا عُبَيْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ سَعْدِ بْنِ إِبْرَاهِيمَ بْنِ سَعْدٍ، قَالَ: حَدَّثَنَا عَمِّي، قَالَ: حَدَّثَنَا أَبِي، عَنْ ابْنِ إِسْحَقَ، قَالَ: حَدَّثَنِي عُبَادَةُ بْنُ الْوَلِيدِ بْنِ عُبَادَةَ بْنِ الصَّامِتِ، عَنْ رُبَيِّعَ بِنْتِ مُعَوِّذٍ، قَالَ: قُلْتُ لَهَا: حَدِّثِينِي حَدِيثَكِ، قَالَتْ: اخْتَلَعْتُ مِنْ زَوْجِي ثُمَّ جِئْتُ عُثْمَانَ، فَسَأَلْتُهُ مَاذَا عَلَيَّ مِنَ الْعِدَّةِ؟ فَقَالَ: «لَا عِدَّةَ عَلَيْكِ إِلَّا أَنْ تَكُونِي حَدِيثَةَ عَهْدٍ بِهِ، فَتَمْكُثِي حَتَّى تَحِيضِي حَيْضَةً». قَالَ: «وَأَنَا مُتَّبِعٌ فِي ذَلِكَ قَضَاءَ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ فِي مَرْيَمَ الْمَغَالِيَّةِ، كَانَتْ تَحْتَ ثَابِتِ بْنِ قَيْسِ بْنِ شَمَّاسٍ فَاخْتَلَعَتْ مِنْهُ»

My commentary

Personal notes

Your commentary saves automatically in this browser, separate from the published commentary. It stays private unless you include it in a shared study file.

Commentary

1. From the verdict of 'Uthman, it transpires that the waiting period of one menstrual cycle is also for acquittal from pregnancy or to verify that she is not pregnant. If sexual intercourse has not taken place during the woman's current purity (the Tuhūr, or the state of purity following menstruation), there is no waiting period even of one menstrual cycle. But since copulation is a concealed matter, the fact of the matter is that the woman granted a Khul' from her husband should wait for one menstrual cycle to intervene, so that nothing is left to doubt or suspicion. 2. It should be borne in mind that returning (taking back) is not possible in Khul'. Later, remarriage is possible because it does not fall in the category of a third divorce.