Sunan an-Nasai

Hadith 3930

Report an issue

Sunan an-Nasai · Hadith 3930

This message and the hadith reference are sent privately to the administrator. Your saved commentary is not included. Please avoid personal or sensitive information. Report terms.

Mentioning The Differing Hadīths Regarding The Prohibition Of Leasing Out Land In Return For One-Third, Or One Quarter Of The Harvest, And The Different Wordings Reported By The Narrators

English source

Darussalam · Volume 4

The Book Of Agriculture

Sunan an-Nasai Darussalam English translation

Arabic source
Shamela Arabic edition (opens in a new tab)

الحديث: 3899 ¦ الجزء: 7 ¦ الصفحة: 43

DarussalamSahihAl-AlbaniSahih
Al-Albani source references (2)
View bookmarks

Select a passage to highlight it. Click or tap a highlight to remove it.

Text and translation

English translation

3930. It was narrated that Hanzalah bin Qais Al-Anšārī said: “I asked Rāfi' bin Khadīj about leasing land in return for Dinārs and silver. He said: ‘There is nothing wrong with that. During the time of the Messenger of Allāh ﷺ they used to rent land to one another in return for what grew on the banks of streams and where the springs emerged – some areas of which might give good produce and some might give none at all – and the people did not lease land in any other way. So that was forbidden. But as for leases where the return is known and guaranteed, there is nothing wrong with that.” (Sahih) Mâlik bin Anas was in accord with the chain, but he differed in the wordings.

Arabic text

3899 - أَخْبَرَنِي الْمُغِيرَةُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ، قَالَ: حَدَّثَنَا عِيسَى هُوَ ابْنُ يُونُسَ، قَالَ: حَدَّثَنَا الْأَوْزَاعِيُّ، عَنْ رَبِيعَةَ بْنِ أَبِي عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ، عَنْ حَنْظَلَةَ بْنِ قَيْسٍ الْأَنْصَارِيِّ، قَالَ: سَأَلْتُ رَافِعَ بْنَ خَدِيجٍ عَنْ كِرَاءِ الْأَرْضِ بِالدِّينَارِ وَالْوَرِقِ؟ فَقَالَ: لَا بَأْسَ بِذَلِكَ، إِنَّمَا كَانَ النَّاسُ عَلَى عَهْدِ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ، يُؤَاجِرُونَ عَلَى الْمَاذِيَانَاتِ، وَأَقْبَالِ الْجَدَاوِلِ، فَيَسْلَمُ هَذَا، وَيَهْلِكُ هَذَا، وَيَسْلَمُ هَذَا، وَيَهْلِكُ هَذَا، فَلَمْ يَكُنْ لِلنَّاسِ كِرَاءٌ إِلَّا هَذَا، فَلِذَلِكَ زُجِرَ عَنْهُ، فَأَمَّا شَيْءٌ مَعْلُومٌ مَضْمُونٌ، فَلَا بَأْسَ بِهِ «وَافَقَهُ مَالِكُ بْنُ أَنَسٍ عَلَى إِسْنَادِهِ، وَخَالَفَهُ فِي لَفْظِهِ»

My commentary

Personal notes

Your commentary saves automatically in this browser, separate from the published commentary. It stays private unless you include it in a shared study file.

Commentary

In other words, the cause of prohibition was the existence of oppressive conditions, on account of which the farmers were incurring an absolute loss. They deceptively used to specify for themselves the harvest produced by the fertile portions of the field, while the harvest produced by the infertile and bad portions was thrown to the farmers by way of good riddance.