Jami at-Tirmidhi

Hadith 1432

Report an issue

Jami at-Tirmidhi · Hadith 1432

This message and the hadith reference are sent privately to the administrator. Your saved commentary is not included. Please avoid personal or sensitive information. Report terms.

What Has Been Related About Confirming Stoning

English source

Darussalam · Volume 3

15. The Chapters On Legal Punishments (Al-Hudūd) From The Messenger Of Allāh ﷺ

Jami at-Tirmidhi Darussalam English translation

Arabic source
Shamela Arabic edition (opens in a new tab)

الجزء: 3 ¦ الصفحة: 101

DarussalamSaḥīhAl-AlbaniSahih
Al-Albani source references (1)
View bookmarks

Select a passage to highlight it. Click or tap a highlight to remove it.

Text and translation

English translation

1432. 'Umar bin Al-Khaṭṭāb said: "Verily Allāh sent Muḥammad ﷺ with the truth, and he revealed the Book to him. Among what was revealed to him was the Āyah of stoning. So the Messenger of Allāh ﷺ stoned, and we stoned after him. I fear that time will pass over the people such that someone will say 'We do not see stoning in the Book of Allāh.' They will be misguided by leaving an obligation which Allāh revealed. Indeed stoning is the retribution for the adulterer if he was married and the evidence has been established, or due to pregnancy, or confession." (Saḥīh) [There is something on this topic from 'Ali. Abū 'Eisā said:] This Hadīth is Ḥasan Saḥīh. [ It has been reported through more than one route from 'Umar bin Al-Khaṭṭāb.]

Arabic text

١٤٣٢ - حَدَّثَنَا ‌سَلَمَةُ بْنُ شَبِيبٍ ‌وَإِسْحَاقُ بْنُ مَنْصُورٍ ‌وَالْحَسَنُ بْنُ عَلِيٍّ الْخَلَّالُ وَغَيْرُ وَاحِدٍ قَالُوا: حَدَّثَنَا ‌عَبْدُ الرَّزَّاقِ ، عَنْ ‌مَعْمَرٍ ، عَنِ ‌الزُّهْرِيِّ، عَنْ ‌عُبَيْدِ اللهِ بْنِ عَبْدِ اللهِ بْنِ عُتْبَةَ ، عَنِ ‌ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ ، عَنْ ‌عُمَرَ بْنِ الْخَطَّابِ قَالَ: «إِنَّ اللهَ بَعَثَ مُحَمَّدًا» صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ بِالْحَقِّ وَأَنْزَلَ عَلَيْهِ الْكِتَابَ، فَكَانَ فِيمَا أَنْزَلَ عَلَيْهِ آيَةُ الرَّجْمِ، فَرَجَمَ رَسُولُ اللهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ وَرَجَمْنَا بَعْدَهُ، وَإِنِّي خَائِفٌ أَنْ يَطُولَ بِالنَّاسِ زَمَانٌ فَيَقُولَ قَائِلٌ لَا نَجِدُ الرَّجْمَ فِي كِتَابِ اللهِ، فَيَضِلُّوا بِتَرْكِ فَرِيضَةٍ أَنْزَلَهَا اللهُ، أَلَا وَإِنَّ الرَّجْمَ حَقٌّ عَلَى مَنْ زَنَى إِذَا أَحْصَنَ وَقَامَتِ الْبَيِّنَةُ، أَوْ كَانَ حَمْلٌ أَوِ اعْتِرَافٌ. هَذَا حَدِيثٌ حَسَنٌ صَحِيحٌ. وَرُوِيَ مِنْ غَيْرِ وَجْهٍ عَنْ عُمَرَ.

My commentary

Personal notes

Your commentary saves automatically in this browser, separate from the published commentary. It stays private unless you include it in a shared study file.

Commentary

Pregnancy will be deemed a proof of fornication if the woman is unmarried or her husband blames her. Though the recitation of this Verse is abrogated but its continuity is not essential for the implication. the presence of a Verse in the Qur'an is considered a proof of its validity and continuity, therefore, rejecting a Saḥīh narration by declaring it information without any proof is not logical thinking.