Jami at-Tirmidhi

Hadith 641

Report an issue

Jami at-Tirmidhi · Hadith 641

This message and the hadith reference are sent privately to the administrator. Your saved commentary is not included. Please avoid personal or sensitive information. Report terms.

What Has Been Related About Zakāt On The Orphan's Wealth

English source

Darussalam · Volume 2

The Chapters On Zakāt[1] From The Messenger of Allāh ﷺ

Jami at-Tirmidhi Darussalam English translation

Arabic source
Shamela Arabic edition (opens in a new tab)

الجزء: 2 ¦ الصفحة: 25

DarussalamDa'ifAl-AlbaniDa‘if
Al-Albani source references (1)
View bookmarks

Select a passage to highlight it. Click or tap a highlight to remove it.

Text and translation

English translation

641. 'Amr bin Shu'aib narrated from his father, from his grandfather that the Prophet ﷺ addressed the people and said: "As for one who is the guardian of an orphan who has wealth, then let him do business with it and not leave it until it becomes consumed by charity." (Da'if) Abū 'Eisā said: This Hadīth was only reported through this route, and there is some criticism of its chain because Al-Muthanna bin Aṣ-Ṣabbāh was considered weak in Hadīth. Some of them reported this Hadīth from 'Amr bin Shu'aib that 'Umar bin Al-Khaṭṭāb, mentioned this Hadīth. The people of knowledge differ over this topic. More than one of the Companions of the Prophet ﷺ held the view that there was Zakāt due on the wealth of the orphan. Among them are 'Umar, 'Alī, 'Aīshah, and Ibn 'Umar. This is the saying of Mālik, Aṣh-Shāfi'ī, Aḥmad and Iṣhāq. A group of the people of knowledge said that there is no Zakāt on the orphan's wealth. This is the view of Sufyān Ath-Thawrī and 'Abdullāh bin Al-Mubārak. 'Amr bin Shu'aib is Ibn Muḥammad bin 'Abdullāh bin 'Amr bin Al-'Aṣ. Shu'aib heard from his grandfather 'Abdullāh bin 'Amr. Yahya bin Sa'eed criticized the narrations of 'Amr bin Shu'aib and said: "He is feeble." Those who considered him weak only said that because he narrated from the scroll of his grandfather 'Abdullāh bin 'Amr. As for the majority of the people of Hadīth, they use the narrations of 'Amr bin Shu'āib for proof and considered him trustworthy, among them are Aḥmad, Iṣhāq and others.

Arabic text

٦٤١ - حَدَّثَنَا ‌مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ إِسْمَاعِيلَ، قَالَ: حَدَّثَنَا ‌إِبْرَاهِيمُ بْنُ مُوسَى، قَالَ: حَدَّثَنَا ‌الْوَلِيدُ بْنُ مُسْلِمٍ، عَنِ ‌الْمُثَنَّى بْنِ الصَّبَّاحِ ، عَنْ ‌عَمْرِو بْنِ شُعَيْبٍ ، عَنْ ‌أَبِيهِ ، عَنْ ‌جَدِّهِ أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ خَطَبَ النَّاسَ فَقَالَ: «أَلَا مَنْ وَلِيَ يَتِيمًا لَهُ مَالٌ فَلْيَتَّجِرْ فِيهِ» وَلَا يَتْرُكْهُ حَتَّى تَأْكُلَهُ الصَّدَقَةُ. وَإِنَّمَا رُوِيَ هَذَا الْحَدِيثُ مِنْ هَذَا الْوَجْهِ، وَفِي إِسْنَادِهِ مَقَالٌ؛ لِأَنَّ الْمُثَنَّى بْنَ الصَّبَّاحِ يُضَعَّفُ فِي الْحَدِيثِ. وَرَوَى بَعْضُهُمْ هَذَا الْحَدِيثَ عَنْ عَمْرِو بْنِ شُعَيْبٍ أَنَّ عُمَرَ بْنَ الْخَطَّابِ - فَذَكَرَ هَذَا الْحَدِيثَ. وَقَدِ اخْتَلَفَ أَهْلُ الْعِلْمِ فِي هَذَا الْبَابِ؛ فَرَأَى غَيْرُ وَاحِدٍ مِنْ أَصْحَابِ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ فِي مَالِ الْيَتِيمِ زَكَاةً، مِنْهُمْ: عُمَرُ، وَعَلِيٌّ، وَعَائِشَةُ، وَابْنُ عُمَرَ، وَبِهِ يَقُولُ مَالِكٌ وَالشَّافِعِيُّ وَأَحْمَدُ وَإِسْحَاقُ. وَقَالَتْ طَائِفَةٌ مِنْ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ: لَيْسَ فِي مَالِ الْيَتِيمِ زَكَاةٌ - وَبِهِ يَقُولُ سُفْيَانُ الثَّوْرِيُّ وَعَبْدُ اللهِ بْنُ الْمُبَارَكِ. وَعَمْرُو بْنُ شُعَيْبٍ هُوَ ابْنُ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ عَبْدِ اللهِ بْنِ عَمْرِو بْنِ الْعَاصِ، وَشُعَيْبٌ قَدْ سَمِعَ مِنْ جَدِّهِ عَبْدِ اللهِ بْنِ عَمْرٍو، وَقَدْ تَكَلَّمَ يَحْيَى بْنُ سَعِيدٍ فِي حَدِيثِ عَمْرِو بْنِ شُعَيْبٍ وَقَالَ: هُوَ عِنْدَنَا وَاهٍ، وَمَنْ ضَعَّفَهُ فَإِنَّمَا ضَعَّفَهُ مِنْ قِبَلِ أَنَّهُ يُحَدِّثُ مِنْ صَحِيفَةِ جَدِّهِ عَبْدِ اللهِ بْنِ عَمْرٍو، وَأَمَّا أَكْثَرُ أَهْلِ الْحَدِيثِ فَيَحْتَجُّونَ بِحَدِيثِ عَمْرِو بْنِ شُعَيْبٍ وَيُثْبِتُونَهُ، مِنْهُمْ أَحْمَدُ وَإِسْحَاقُ وَغَيْرُهُمَا.

My commentary

Personal notes

Your commentary saves automatically in this browser, separate from the published commentary. It stays private unless you include it in a shared study file.

Commentary

Although this narration, regarding the Zakāt due from the property of an orphan child is weak, yet its view is supported by the verdicts of various Companions. The order of paying the Zakāt is given to the guardian, not the child.