Jami at-Tirmidhi

Hadith 676

Report an issue

Jami at-Tirmidhi · Hadith 676

This message and the hadith reference are sent privately to the administrator. Your saved commentary is not included. Please avoid personal or sensitive information. Report terms.

What Has Been Related About Ṣadaqat Al-Fitr.

English source

Darussalam · Volume 2

The Chapters On Zakāt[1] From The Messenger of Allāh ﷺ

Jami at-Tirmidhi Darussalam English translation

Arabic source
Shamela Arabic edition (opens in a new tab)

الجزء: 2 ¦ الصفحة: 54

DarussalamṢaḥīhAl-AlbaniSahih
Al-Albani source references (1)
View bookmarks

Select a passage to highlight it. Click or tap a highlight to remove it.

Text and translation

English translation

676. Ibn 'Umar narrated: "The Messenger of Allāh ﷺ made Sadaqatul-Fitr of Ramaḍān an obligation – a Ṣā' of dried dates or a Ṣā' of barley – required upon every free person and slave, male and female among the Muslims." (Ṣaḥīh) Abū 'Eisā said: The Hadīth of Ibn 'Umar is a Ḥasan Ṣaḥīh Hadīth. Mālik reported the Hadīth on this topic from Nāfi', from Ibn 'Umar, from the Prophet ﷺ, and he added in it: "among the Muslims" while others reported it from Nāfi' and they did not mention "among the Muslims" in it. The people of knowledge differ over this, some of them say that when a man has some non-Muslim slaves then he does not pay Sadaqatul-Fitr on their behalf. This is the opinion of Mālik, Ash-Shāfi'i, and Aḥmad. Some of them said that he pays it on their behalf even if they are not Muslims, and this is the saying of Sufyān Ath-Thawri, Ibn Al-Mubārak and Ishāq.

Arabic text

٦٧٦ - حَدَّثَنَا ‌إِسْحَاقُ بْنُ مُوسَى الْأَنْصَارِيُّ، قَالَ: حَدَّثَنَا ‌مَعْنٌ ، قَالَ: حَدَّثَنَا ‌مَالِكٌ ، عَنْ ‌نَافِعٍ ، عَنْ ‌عَبْدِ اللهِ بْنِ عُمَرَ «أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ فَرَضَ» زَكَاةَ الْفِطْرِ مِنْ رَمَضَانَ صَاعًا مِنْ تَمْرٍ أَوْ صَاعًا مِنْ شَعِيرٍ، عَلَى كُلِّ حُرٍّ أَوْ عَبْدٍ، ذَكَرٍ أَوْ أُنْثَى مِنَ الْمُسْلِمِينَ. حَدِيثُ ابْنِ عُمَرَ حَدِيثٌ حَسَنٌ صَحِيحٌ. وَرَوَى مَالِكٌ، عَنْ نَافِعٍ، عَنِ ابْنِ عُمَرَ، عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ نَحْوَ حَدِيثِ أَيُّوبَ، وَزَادَ فِيهِ: مِنَ الْمُسْلِمِينَ. وَرَوَاهُ غَيْرُ وَاحِدٍ عَنْ نَافِعٍ، وَلَمْ يَذْكُرْ فِيهِ: مِنَ الْمُسْلِمِينَ. وَاخْتَلَفَ أَهْلُ الْعِلْمِ فِي هَذَا، فَقَالَ بَعْضُهُمْ: إِذَا كَانَ لِلرَّجُلِ عَبِيدٌ غَيْرُ مُسْلِمِينَ لَمْ يُؤَدِّ عَنْهُمْ صَدَقَةَ الْفِطْرِ - وَهُوَ قَوْلُ مَالِكٍ وَالشَّافِعِيِّ وَأَحْمَدَ. وَقَالَ بَعْضُهُمْ: يُؤَدِّي عَنْهُمْ، وَإِنْ كَانُوا غَيْرَ مُسْلِمِينَ - وَهُوَ قَوْلُ الثَّوْرِيِّ وَابْنِ الْمُبَارَكِ وَإِسْحَاقَ.

My commentary

Personal notes

Your commentary saves automatically in this browser, separate from the published commentary. It stays private unless you include it in a shared study file.

Commentary

In the opinion of the majority of scholars, Islam is a condition for paying Sadaqatul-Fitr, Therefore, it is due only from a Muslim. It is not necessary to pay Sadaqatul-Fitr on behalf of a non-Muslim slave, but it is compulsory according to 'Aṭā, An-Nakha'i, Ath-Thawri and the Aḥnaf. (Faṭh Al-Bār: 3/467)