Jami at-Tirmidhi

Hadith 1270

Report an issue

Jami at-Tirmidhi · Hadith 1270

This message and the hadith reference are sent privately to the administrator. Your saved commentary is not included. Please avoid personal or sensitive information. Report terms.

What Has Been Related About When The Buyer And Seller Disagree

English source

Darussalam · Volume 3

12. The Chapters On Business From The Messenger of Allāh ﷺ

Jami at-Tirmidhi Darussalam English translation

Arabic source
Shamela Arabic edition (opens in a new tab)

الجزء: 2 ¦ الصفحة: 548

DarussalamHasanAl-AlbaniSahih
Al-Albani source references (1)
View bookmarks

Select a passage to highlight it. Click or tap a highlight to remove it.

Text and translation

English translation

1270. Ibn Mas'ūd narrated that the Messenger of Allāh ﷺ said: "When the two parties (in a deal) disagree then the seller's statement is taken as valid, and the purchaser retains the option." (Hasan) [Abū 'Eisā said:] This Hadīth is Mursal. 'Awn bin 'Abdullāh did not see Ibn Mas'ūd. This Hadīth has also been reported from Al-Qāsim bin 'Abdur-Rahmān, from Ibn Mas'ūd, from the Prophet ﷺ. But that is also Mursal. [Abū 'Eisā said:] [Ishāq] Ibn Manšūr said: "I said to Aḥmad: what if when the two parties disagree and there is no proof (what is done)?" He said: 'The saying of the owner of the merchandise is taken as valid or they both refuse.' And Ishāq said as he did, and that in every case where his saying is taken, he must swear." [Abū 'Eisā said:] Similar to this has been reported from some of [the people of knowledge among] the Tābi'īn, Shurāih is among those.

Arabic text

١٢٧٠ - حَدَّثَنَا ‌قُتَيْبَةُ، قَالَ: حَدَّثَنَا ‌سُفْيَانُ، عَنِ ‌ابْنِ عَجْلَانَ ، عَنْ ‌عَوْنِ بْنِ عَبْدِ اللهِ، عَنِ ‌ابْنِ مَسْعُودٍ قَالَ: قَالَ رَسُولُ اللهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ: «إِذَا اخْتَلَفَ الْبَيِّعَانِ» فَالْقَوْلُ قَوْلُ الْبَائِعِ، وَالْمُبْتَاعُ بِالْخِيَارِ. هَذَا حَدِيثٌ مُرْسَلٌ، عَوْنُ بْنُ عَبْدِ اللهِ لَمْ يُدْرِكِ ابْنَ مَسْعُودٍ. وَقَدْ رُوِيَ عَنِ الْقَاسِمِ بْنِ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ عَنِ ابْنِ مَسْعُودٍ، عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ هَذَا الْحَدِيثُ أَيْضًا، وَهُوَ مُرْسَلٌ أَيْضًا. قَالَ إِسْحَاقُ بْنُ مَنْصُورٍ: قُلْتُ لِأَحْمَدَ: إِذَا اخْتَلَفَ الْبَيِّعَانِ وَلَمْ تَكُنْ بَيِّنَةٌ؟ قَالَ: الْقَوْلُ مَا قَالَ رَبُّ السِّلْعَةِ، أَوْ يَتَرَادَّانِ. قَالَ إِسْحَاقُ: كَمَا قَالَ، وَكُلُّ مَنْ كَانَ الْقَوْلُ قَوْلَهُ فَعَلَيْهِ الْيَمِينُ. هَكَذَا رُوِيَ عَنْ بَعْضِ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ مِنَ التَّابِعِينَ، مِنْهُمْ شُرَيْحٌ وَغَيْرُهُ، وَنَحْوُ هَذَا.

My commentary

Personal notes

Your commentary saves automatically in this browser, separate from the published commentary. It stays private unless you include it in a shared study file.

Commentary

The basic cause of dispute is not clear in this narration. Disagreement of the parties was on the commodity itself, or on its price, or on some condition put on it. Many of the scholars generalize the application of this narration. This narration is applicable to all kinds of disputes, and according to 'Allāmah Ibn Qudāmah, if someone has no witness, then both of the parties will take an oath.