Jami at-Tirmidhi

Hadith 1347

Report an issue

Jami at-Tirmidhi · Hadith 1347

This message and the hadith reference are sent privately to the administrator. Your saved commentary is not included. Please avoid personal or sensitive information. Report terms.

What Has Been Related About A Slave Owned By Two Men And One Of Them Frees His Portion Of Him

English source

Darussalam · Volume 3

13. The Chapters On Judgements From The Messenger of Allāh ﷺ

Jami at-Tirmidhi Darussalam English translation

Arabic source
Shamela Arabic edition (opens in a new tab)

الجزء: 3 ¦ الصفحة: 23

DarussalamSahīhAl-AlbaniSahih
Al-Albani source references (1)
View bookmarks

Select a passage to highlight it. Click or tap a highlight to remove it.

Text and translation

English translation

1347. Sālim narrated from his father that the Prophet ﷺ said: "Whoever frees a portion of a slave he owns, then he can afford the remainder of the price, then he should free him with his wealth." (Sahīh) [Abū 'Eisā said:] This Hadīth is [Hasan Sahīh]. based on an oath along with one witness." He said: "And 'Alī judged between you based on it." (Ṣaḥīḥ) [Abū 'Eisā said:] This is more correct. This is how Sufyān Ath-Thawrī reported it from Ja'far bin Muḥammad, from his father, from the Prophet ﷺ, in Mursal form. 'Abdul-'Azīz bin Abī Salamah and Yahya bin Sulaim reported this Hadīth from Ja'far bin Muḥammad, from his father, from 'Alī, from the Prophet ﷺ. This is acted upon according to some of the people of knowledge among the Companions of the Prophet ﷺ and others. They held the view that an oath along with one witness was acceptable in cases of rights and wealth. This is the view of Mālik bin Anas, Ash-Shāfi'ī, Ahmad, and Ishāq. They said that a judgement is not passed based upon an oath and one witness except in cases of rights and property. Some of the people of knowledge among the people of Al-Kūfah and others did not hold the view that a judgement could be based upon an oath along with one witness.

Arabic text

١٣٤٧ - وَقَدْ رَوَاهُ سَالِمٌ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ نَحْوَهُ حَدَّثَنَا بِذَلِكَ ‌الْحَسَنُ بْنُ عَلِيٍّ الْخَلَّالُ، قَالَ: حَدَّثَنَا ‌عَبْدُ الرَّزَّاقِ، قَالَ: أَخْبَرَنَا ‌مَعْمَرٌ ، عَنِ ‌الزُّهْرِيِّ ، عَنْ ‌سَالِمٍ ، عَنْ ‌أَبِيهِ عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ قَالَ: «مَنْ أَعْتَقَ نَصِيبًا لَهُ فِي عَبْدٍ فَكَانَ لَهُ مِنَ الْمَالِ مَا يَبْلُغُ ثَمَنَهُ»، فَهُوَ عَتِيقٌ مِنْ مَالِهِ هَذَا حَدِيثٌ صَحِيحٌ.

My commentary

Personal notes

Your commentary saves automatically in this browser, separate from the published commentary. It stays private unless you include it in a shared study file.

Commentary

If the claimant has only one witness, then in the light of the Ṣaḥīḥ narration, the claimant will take an oath in place of the second witness. Imām Mālik, Imām Ash-Shāfi'ī, Imām Ahmad, Imām Ishāq and most of the scholars have the same view. One witness and an oath is only for monetary disputes, and for all other types of disputes two witnesses are required. (Muslim and Nawawī. v. 2. p. 74.).