Jami at-Tirmidhi

Hadith 2182

Report an issue

Jami at-Tirmidhi · Hadith 2182

This message and the hadith reference are sent privately to the administrator. Your saved commentary is not included. Please avoid personal or sensitive information. Report terms.

What Has Been Related About The Moon Splitting

English source

Darussalam · Volume 4

31. Chapters On Al-Fitan From The Messenger Of Allāh ﷺ

Jami at-Tirmidhi Darussalam English translation

Arabic source
Shamela Arabic edition (opens in a new tab)

الجزء: 4 ¦ الصفحة: 51

DarussalamSahihAl-AlbaniSahih
Al-Albani source references (1)
View bookmarks

Select a passage to highlight it. Click or tap a highlight to remove it.

Text and translation

English translation

2182. Ibn 'Umar said: "The moon split during the time of the Messenger of Allāh ﷺ, so the Messenger of Allāh ﷺ said: 'Bear witness.'" (Sahih) [Abū 'Eisā said:] There are narrations on this topic from Ibn Mas'ūd, Anas, and Jubair bin Mu'tam. This Hadīth is Ḥasan Sahih.

Arabic text

٢١٨٢ - حَدَّثَنَا ‌مَحْمُودُ بْنُ غَيْلَانَ، قَالَ: حَدَّثَنَا ‌أَبُو دَاوُدَ ، عَنْ ‌شُعْبَةَ ، عَنِ ‌الْأَعْمَشِ، عَنْ ‌مُجَاهِدٍ ، عَنِ ‌ابْنِ عُمَرَ قَالَ: «انْفَلَقَ الْقَمَرُ عَلَى عَهْدِ رَسُولِ اللهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ»، فَقَالَ رَسُولُ اللهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ: اشْهَدُوا. وَفِي الْبَابِ عَنِ ابْنِ مَسْعُودٍ، وَأَنَسٍ، وَجُبَيْرِ بْنِ مُطْعِمٍ. وَهَذَا حَدِيثٌ حَسَنٌ صَحِيحٌ.

My commentary

Personal notes

Your commentary saves automatically in this browser, separate from the published commentary. It stays private unless you include it in a shared study file.

Commentary

It so happened, before the Messenger of Allāh's ﷺ Emigration, that a party of the idolaters who were seated with him ﷺ in Minā, asked him to show them a sign (miracle). So, Allāh, in His Supreme Might and Power, cleft the moon asunder in two. Chapter 54 of the Qur'ān in fact opens with the mention of this miracle. A miracle, by definition, is the demonstration of a Prophet's veracity and of the Supreme Might of Allāh. It would, therefore, be in vain to deny it, and there is absolutely no need for anyone to apologetically explain it or misrepresent it in any way.