Jami at-Tirmidhi

Hadith 399

Report an issue

Jami at-Tirmidhi · Hadith 399

This message and the hadith reference are sent privately to the administrator. Your saved commentary is not included. Please avoid personal or sensitive information. Report terms.

What Has Been Related About A Man Who Says The Taslīm After Two Rak'ah During The Zuhr Or 'Aṣr Prayers

English source

Darussalam · Volume 1

2. The Chapters On Ṣalāt (As Narrated) From Allāh's Messenger ﷺ

Jami at-Tirmidhi Darussalam English translation

Arabic source
Shamela Arabic edition (opens in a new tab)

الجزء: 1 ¦ الصفحة: 425

DarussalamSahīhAl-AlbaniSahih
Al-Albani source references (1)
View bookmarks

Select a passage to highlight it. Click or tap a highlight to remove it.

Text and translation

English translation

399. Abū Hurairah narrated: "The Prophet ﷺ turned (finishing the prayer) after two (Rak'ah), so Dhul-Yadain said: 'Has the prayer been shortened or have you forgotten O Messenger of Allāh?' The Prophet ﷺ said: 'Is what Dhul-Yadain said the truth?' The people said yes, so Allāh's Messenger ﷺ stood to perform the last two (Rak'ah) of Ṣalāt, then he said the Taslīm. Then he said the Takbīr and prostrated in a manner the same or longer than his (normal) prostrations." (Sahīh) [Abū 'Eisā said:] There are narrations on this topic from 'Imrān bin Ḥuṣain, Ibn 'Umar, and Dhul-Yadain. Abū 'Eisā said: The Ḥadīth of Abū Hurairah is a Ḥasan Ṣahīh Ḥadīth. The people of knowledge differ over this Ḥadīth. Some of the people of Al-Kūfah said that when one speaks during the Ṣalāt forgetfully, or out of ignorance, or whatever the case, then he is to repeat the Ṣalāt, and they reason that this Ḥadīth was before talking was prohibited in the Ṣalāt. [He said] As for Ash-Shāfi'i he considered this Ḥadīth correct and his view was in accordance with it. He said: This is more correct than the Hadīth which was reported from the Prophet ﷺ about the fasting person who ate forgetfully, that he did not need to make it up, and that it is only provisions which Allāh has provided. Ash-Shāfi'i said: "These people differentiate between purposefully and forgetfully in the case of the fasting person who ate due to the Hadīth of Abū Hurairah." Aḥmad said about the Hadīth of Abū Hurairah that if the Imām talks about something related to the Ṣalāt while he thinks that he has completed it, then he learns that he did not complete it, he is to complete his Ṣalāt. And whoever talks behind the Imām while he knows that he has some of the Ṣalāt remaining, then it is required for him to restart it. He argues that the obligations were still being added to or decreased during the time of Allāh's Messenger ﷺ. So Dhul-Yadain only spoke when he was certain that he had completed his Ṣalāt. But this is not the case today, no one can talk about the topic that Dhul-Yadain talked about because today there can be no increase or decrease to the obligations. So Aḥmad said something similar to this, and Ishāq said what was similar to Aḥmad's saying about this topic.

Arabic text

٣٩٩ - حَدَّثَنَا ‌الْأَنْصَارِيُّ، قَالَ: حَدَّثَنَا ‌مَعْنٌ، قَالَ: حَدَّثَنَا ‌مَالِكٌ ، عَنْ ‌أَيُّوبَ بْنِ أَبِي تَمِيمَةَ، وَهُوَ السَّخْتِيَانِيُّ عَنْ ‌مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ سِيرِينَ ، عَنْ ‌أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ «أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ انْصَرَفَ مِنَ اثْنَتَيْنِ، فَقَالَ لَهُ ذُو الْيَدَيْنِ:» أَقَصُرَتِ الصَّلَاةُ أَمْ نَسِيتَ يَا رَسُولَ اللهِ؟ فَقَالَ رَسُولُ اللهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ: أَصَدَقَ ذُو الْيَدَيْنِ؟ فَقَالَ النَّاسُ: نَعَمْ، فَقَامَ رَسُولُ اللهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ فَصَلَّى اثْنَتَيْنِ أُخْرَيَيْنِ ثُمَّ سَلَّمَ، ثُمَّ كَبَّرَ فَسَجَدَ مِثْلَ سُجُودِهِ أَوْ أَطْوَلَ، ثُمَّ كَبَّرَ فَرَفَعَ، ثُمَّ سَجَدَ مِثْلَ سُجُودِهِ أَوْ أَطْوَلَ. وَفِي الْبَابِ عَنْ عِمْرَانَ بْنِ حُصَيْنٍ، وَابْنِ عُمَرَ وَذِي الْيَدَيْنِ. وَحَدِيثُ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ حَدِيثٌ حَسَنٌ صَحِيحٌ. وَاخْتَلَفَ أَهْلُ الْعِلْمِ فِي هَذَا الْحَدِيثِ: فَقَالَ بَعْضُ أَهْلِ الْكُوفَةِ: إِذَا تَكَلَّمَ فِي الصَّلَاةِ، نَاسِيًا أَوْ جَاهِلًا أَوْ مَا كَانَ، فَإِنَّهُ يُعِيدُ الصَّلَاةَ، وَاعْتَلُّوا بِأَنَّ هَذَا الْحَدِيثَ كَانَ قَبْلَ تَحْرِيمِ الْكَلَامِ فِي الصَّلَاةِ. وَأَمَّا الشَّافِعِيُّ فَرَأَى هَذَا حَدِيثًا صَحِيحًا فَقَالَ بِهِ وَقَالَ: هَذَا أَصَحُّ مِنَ الْحَدِيثِ الَّذِي رُوِيَ عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ فِي الصَّائِمِ إِذَا أَكَلَ نَاسِيًا فَإِنَّهُ لَا يَقْضِي وَإِنَّمَا هُوَ رِزْقٌ رَزَقَهُ اللهُ. قَالَ الشَّافِعِيُّ: وَفَرَّقُوا هَؤُلَاءِ بَيْنَ الْعَمْدِ وَالنِّسْيَانِ فِي أَكْلِ الصَّائِمِ لِحَدِيثِ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ. وَقَالَ أَحْمَدُ فِي حَدِيثِ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ: إِنْ تَكَلَّمَ الْإِمَامُ فِي شَيْءٍ مِنْ صَلَاتِهِ، وَهُوَ يَرَى أَنَّهُ قَدْ أَكْمَلَهَا، ثُمَّ عَلِمَ أَنَّهُ لَمْ يُكْمِلْهَا: يُتِمُّ صَلَاتَهُ، وَمَنْ تَكَلَّمَ خَلْفَ الْإِمَامِ وَهُوَ يَعْلَمُ أَنَّ عَلَيْهِ بَقِيَّةً مِنَ الصَّلَاةِ فَعَلَيْهِ أَنْ يَسْتَقْبِلَهَا، وَاحْتَجَّ بِأَنَّ الْفَرَائِضَ كَانَتْ تُزَادُ، وَتُنْقَصُ عَلَى عَهْدِ رَسُولِ اللهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ، فَإِنَّمَا تَكَلَّمَ ذُو الْيَدَيْنِ وَهُوَ عَلَى يَقِينٍ مِنْ صَلَاتِهِ أَنَّهَا تَمَّتْ، وَلَيْسَ هَكَذَا الْيَوْمَ، لَيْسَ لِأَحَدٍ أَنْ يَتَكَلَّمَ عَلَى مَعْنَى مَا تَكَلَّمَ ذُو الْيَدَيْنِ؛ لِأَنَّ الْفَرَائِضَ الْيَوْمَ لَا يُزَادُ فِيهَا وَلَا يُنْقَصُ. قَالَ أَحْمَدُ نَحْوًا مِنْ هَذَا الْكَلَامِ. وَقَالَ إِسْحَاقُ نَحْوَ قَوْلِ أَحْمَدَ فِي هَذَا الْبَابِ.

My commentary

Personal notes

Your commentary saves automatically in this browser, separate from the published commentary. It stays private unless you include it in a shared study file.

Commentary

This issue is agreed; that if a person intentionally and deliberately talks in the prayer, and it has nothing to do with the correction and reform of the prayer, his prayer is annulled.