Jami at-Tirmidhi

Hadith 636

Report an issue

Jami at-Tirmidhi · Hadith 636

This message and the hadith reference are sent privately to the administrator. Your saved commentary is not included. Please avoid personal or sensitive information. Report terms.

What Has Been Related About Zakāt On Jewelry

English source

Darussalam · Volume 2

The Chapters On Zakāt[1] From The Messenger of Allāh ﷺ

Jami at-Tirmidhi Darussalam English translation

Arabic source
Shamela Arabic edition (opens in a new tab)

الجزء: 2 ¦ الصفحة: 21

DarussalamṢaḥīḥAl-AlbaniNot found
View bookmarks

Select a passage to highlight it. Click or tap a highlight to remove it.

Text and translation

English translation

636. 'Amr bin Al-Hārīth, the nephew of Zainab, the wife of 'Abdullāh, narrated that Zainab, the wife of 'Abdullāh narrated similarly from the Prophet ﷺ. (Ṣaḥīḥ) (Abū 'Eisā said:) This is more correct than the (previous) narration of Abū Mu'āwiyah. Abū Mu'āwiyah was confused in his narration, he said: "(From) 'Amr bin Al-Ĥārith, from the nephew of Zainab" but what is correct is that it is from 'Amr bin Al-Ĥārith, the nephew of Zainab. It has also been reported from 'Amr bin Shu'aib, from his father, from his grandfather, from the Prophet ﷺ that he accepted jewelry for Zakāt, but there is some disparagement related to the chain. The people of knowledge differ over that, some of the people of knowledge among the Companions of the Prophet ﷺ, and the Tābi'īn thought that Zakāt was due on jewelry that was gold or silver. This is the view of Sufyān Ath-Thawrī and 'Abdullāh bin Al-Mubārak. Some of the Companions of the Prophet ﷺ, among them Ibn 'Umar, 'Aishah, Jābir bin 'Abdullāh and Anas bin Mālik said: "There is no Zakāt due on jewelry." That was reported from some of the Fuqahā' among the Tābi'īn. This is the view of Mālik bin Anas, Ash-Shāfi'ī, Aḥmad, and Ishāq.

Arabic text

٦٣٦ - حَدَّثَنَا ‌مَحْمُودُ بْنُ غَيْلَانَ، قَالَ: حَدَّثَنَا ‌أَبُو دَاوُدَ ، عَنْ ‌شُعْبَةَ ، عَنِ ‌الْأَعْمَشِ قَالَ: سَمِعْتُ ‌أَبَا وَائِلٍ يُحَدِّثُ، عَنْ ‌عَمْرِو بْنِ الْحَارِثِ ابْنِ أَخِي زَيْنَبَ امْرَأَةِ عَبْدِ اللهِ، عَنْ ‌زَيْنَبَ امْرَأَةِ عَبْدِ اللهِ ، عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ نَحْوَهُ. وَهَذَا أَصَحُّ مِنْ حَدِيثِ أَبِي مُعَاوِيَةَ، وَأَبُو مُعَاوِيَةَ وَهِمَ فِي حَدِيثِهِ فَقَالَ: عَنْ عَمْرِو بْنِ الْحَارِثِ عَنِ ابْنِ أَخِي زَيْنَبَ - وَالصَّحِيحُ إِنَّمَا هُوَ عَنْ عَمْرِو بْنِ الْحَارِثِ ابْنِ أَخِي زَيْنَبَ. وَقَدْ رُوِيَ عَنْ عَمْرِو بْنِ شُعَيْبٍ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنْ جَدِّهِ، عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ أَنَّهُ رَأَى فِي الْحُلِيِّ زَكَاةً. وَفِي إِسْنَادِ هَذَا الْحَدِيثِ مَقَالٌ. وَاخْتَلَفَ أَهْلُ الْعِلْمِ فِي ذَلِكَ؛ فَرَأَى بَعْضُ أَهْلِ الْعِلْمِ مِنْ أَصْحَابِ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ وَالتَّابِعِينَ فِي الْحُلِيِّ زَكَاةَ مَا كَانَ مِنْهُ ذَهَبٌ وَفِضَّةٌ، وَبِهِ يَقُولُ سُفْيَانُ الثَّوْرِيُّ وَعَبْدُ اللهِ بْنُ الْمُبَارَكِ. وَقَالَ بَعْضُ أَصْحَابِ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ - مِنْهُمُ: ابْنُ عُمَرَ، وَعَائِشَةُ، وَجَابِرُ بْنُ عَبْدِ اللهِ، وَأَنَسُ بْنُ مَالِكٍ: لَيْسَ فِي الْحُلِيِّ زَكَاةٌ. وَهَكَذَا رُوِيَ عَنْ بَعْضِ فُقَهَاءِ التَّابِعِينَ، وَبِهِ يَقُولُ مَالِكُ بْنُ أَنَسٍ وَالشَّافِعِيُّ وَأَحْمَدُ وَإِسْحَاقُ.

My commentary

Personal notes

Your commentary saves automatically in this browser, separate from the published commentary. It stays private unless you include it in a shared study file.

Commentary

In the light of evidence, the opinion of those who are in favor of Zakāt on jewelry is correct, provided the jewelry is equal or more than the Nisāb. (Subuh-Salām: 2/192, Mir'āt: 3/81)