Jami at-Tirmidhi

Hadith 85

Report an issue

Jami at-Tirmidhi · Hadith 85

This message and the hadith reference are sent privately to the administrator. Your saved commentary is not included. Please avoid personal or sensitive information. Report terms.

[What Has Been Related About] Not Performing Wudū' For Touching The Penis

English source

Darussalam · Volume 1

1. The Chapters on Purification (Tahārah) From Allāh’s Messenger ﷺ

Jami at-Tirmidhi Darussalam English translation

Arabic source
Shamela Arabic edition (opens in a new tab)

الجزء: 1 ¦ الصفحة: 127

DarussalamṢaḥīḥAl-AlbaniSahih
Al-Albani source references (1)
View bookmarks

Select a passage to highlight it. Click or tap a highlight to remove it.

Text and translation

English translation

85. Qais bin Ṭalq bin 'Alī – [and he is:] Al-Ḥanafī – narrated from his father, that the Prophet ﷺ said: "Is it anything other than a piece of his flesh?" Or: "part of him?" (Ṣaḥīḥ) He said: There is something on this topic from Abū Umāmah. Abū 'Eisā said: It has been reported from more than one of the Companions of the Prophet ﷺ, and some of the Tābi'īn that they did not hold the view that Wudū' was required for touching the penis. And this is the saying of the people of Al-Kūfah and Ibn Al-Mubārak. This Hadīth is the best thing reported on this topic. And this Hadīth has been reported by Ayyūb bin 'Utbah and Muḥammad bin Jābir from Qais bin Ṭalq from his father. Some of the people of Hadīth have criticized Muḥammad bin Jābir and Ayyūb bin 'Utbah. The Ḥadīth of Mulāzim bin 'Amr from 'Abdullāh bin Badr (no. 85) is the most correct and the best.

Arabic text

٨٥ - حَدَّثَنَا ‌هَنَّادٌ، قَالَ: حَدَّثَنَا ‌مُلَازِمُ بْنُ عَمْرٍو ، عَنْ ‌عَبْدِ اللهِ بْنِ بَدْرٍ، عَنْ ‌قَيْسِ بْنِ طَلْقِ بْنِ عَلِيٍّ الْحَنَفِيِّ عَنْ ‌أَبِيهِ، عَنِ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ قَالَ: «وَهَلْ هُوَ إِلَّا مُضْغَةٌ مِنْهُ؟ أَوْ بَضْعَةٌ مِنْهُ»؟. وَفِي الْبَابِ عَنْ أَبِي أُمَامَةَ. وَقَدْ رُوِيَ عَنْ غَيْرِ وَاحِدٍ مِنْ أَصْحَابِ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ وَبَعْضِ التَّابِعِينَ أَنَّهُمْ لَمْ يَرَوُا الْوُضُوءَ مِنْ مَسِّ الذَّكَرِ، وَهُوَ قَوْلُ أَهْلِ الْكُوفَةِ وَابْنِ الْمُبَارَكِ. وَهَذَا الْحَدِيثُ أَحَسَنُ شَيْءٍ رُوِيَ فِي هَذَا الْبَابِ. وَقَدْ رَوَى هَذَا الْحَدِيثَ أَيُّوبُ بْنُ عُتْبَةَ وَمُحَمَّدُ بْنُ جَابِرٍ، عَنْ قَيْسِ بْنِ طَلْقٍ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ. وَقَدْ تَكَلَّمَ بَعْضُ أَهْلِ الْحَدِيثِ فِي مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ جَابِرٍ وَأَيُّوبَ بْنِ عُتْبَةَ. وَحَدِيثُ مُلَازِمِ بْنِ عَمْرٍو، عَنْ عَبْدِ اللهِ بْنِ بَدْرٍ أَصَحُّ وَأَحْسَنُ.

My commentary

Personal notes

Your commentary saves automatically in this browser, separate from the published commentary. It stays private unless you include it in a shared study file.

Commentary

The Aḥādīth regarding the nullification of ablution (by touching the private parts) are more and stronger; therefore the nullification of ablution is more cautious and accurate.